Letters regarding a controversy

Debating a Hypothesis:

To the Editor:

Re “Criticism of a Gender Theory, and a Scientist Under Siege” (Aug. 21): Benedict Carey casts this story as a matter of politically correct thugs trying to undermine Dr. J. Michael Bailey’s legitimate scientific research. But even Dr. Bailey’s defenders admit the research in question turned out to rest on shoddy anecdotal evidence.

In light of that fact, the story can’t possibly concern “the corrosive effects of political correctness on academic freedom,” as someone quoted in the article claims. The question was whether his book had any legitimate scientific basis. And it didn’t. But perhaps that doesn’t make for a very interesting story.

John Casey
Chicago

•

To the Editor:

It’s unscientific to require an explanation for gay or transgender identities but not heterosexual, nontransgender identities.

The Bailey hypothesis claims that biological males who identify as women are either trying to attract men or to fulfill their own fantasies. The “alternate” hypothesis is not always the “woman trapped in a man’s body” cliché; the alternative is to let people describe their lives in their own terms.

Karen Hogan
Olympia, Wash.

•

To the Editor:

Dr. Ben Barres should choke on his observation that Dr. J. Michael Bailey “seems to make a living by claiming that the things people hold most deeply true are not true” — unless he condemns Galileo, Darwin, Einstein, Leakey et al.

James W. Voelz
St. Louis

UK: Boys who like girls to be boys . . .

In Neil Bartlett’s Twelfth Night, the male comic roles are played by women. Our correspondent asks who’s really wearing the trousers

Lucy Powell

Look at what you’re wearing,” Neil Bartlett, writer, director, profligate translator and provocative performer demands. “Jeans, a T-shirt, trainers. What does it say?” Not, thankfully, that I really ought to have made more of a sartorial effort for our interview in the RSC’s Clapham rehearsal rooms. Breeches-deep in preparations for his bewilderingly cross-gartered Twelfth Night, Bartlett is busy unpacking the mercurial concept of staging gender.

“You and I are essentially wearing the same thing. But you are not dressing as a man. I am not dressing as a woman. We are not attempting to disguise our sex.” His slug of a moustache would surely prove something of a handicap. “Not really,” he says, smiling. “There are infinite ways to play gender.” He explains: “It can be ravishingly sexy, it can be very precisely unsexed. Some of my casting is completely true to type. Lady Olivia [Justine Mitchell] is an extraordinary, thoroughbred woman. Count Orsino [Jason Mer-rells] is a gorgeous man, but they’re playing opposite a Viola [Chris New] who is very obviously an attractive young man with false tits. It releases proceedings from the grip of naturalism immediately.”

Shakespeare’s slippery, androgynous twin, shipwrecked on Illyria’s shores, who disguises herself as a boy and falls desperately, inappropriately in love, is often played by a man. This year, Ed Hall and Declan Donnellan both staged their all-male Twelfth Nights at the Old Vic and The Swan theatres.

In Bartlett’s production, however, the male comic characters are also played by women. “They are the creators of mayhem in the play,” he says. “And to see Malvolio chased about by three expert comediennes in padded Y-fronts is a delicious sight. I cannot conceive of a more perfect Toby Belch than Marjorie Yates. Twelfth Night is this incredible dressing-up box of a play and everyone has to find their costume.

“To me it just isn’t strange,” Bartlett adds, “because I’ve never done anything else. One of the first pieces of theatre I ever did was called Dressing Up.” . . .

Replay: The Cliks - Oh Yeah

The Cliks 100.3 Q Interview

Album, Snakehouse

First Transgendered Lead Singer Signed by Major Label

From NPR this AM:

“The rock band the Cliks has gotten a lot of attention this summer after touring with Cyndi Lauper, and the band is being compared to the Pretenders and David Bowie. But there’s another reason why the band is in the spotlight: lead singer, Lucas Silveira. When the band was first formed he was a she — Lillia Silveira, who fronted an all-female band. But the musician has since transitioned into a male, making him the first transgender lead singer to be signed to a major label with the album, Snakehouse.”

You can listen to the segment here. Lucas has decided to not take testosterone for fear of altering his singing voice, a decision that was easier to make thanks to the example set by one of his FTM friends who purposefully chose to avoid hormones because he didn’t want to blend. Apparently he wants to be recognized as TS since anyone can be a genetic male but being transgendered is unique. An interesting perspective that is sure to stir up controversy in the community but probably a sign of things to come as traditional concepts of gender continue to be challenged.

Second Life: Testing being transgendered

A life less ordinary offers far more than just escapism

Anil Ananthaswamy
New Scientist
25 August 2007

WILLIAM WISE had always felt he should have been born a woman. A year and a half ago, he finally got the chance to live as one. He chose a provocative new look: a cute, contemporary hairstyle with bangs, a tank top with spaghetti straps and a plunging neckline, and bare midriff. There was one twist, however. He had to live inside an online virtual world called Second Life. . .

First Person: Bigendered

Gender Discrimination Charges In PDX, OR

My name is Lisa/Lee Iacuzzi and I have two separate gender discrimination complaints against two nonprofits in the city of Portland, OR. They have been officially charged for discrimination in housing through the Bureau of Labor and Industry. I believe these claims could have been avoided by having a clarification about people who are bigendered. Yes, I am saying another label in the gay community that is not being well used to describe individuals who are now called transgendered.

I believe the term transgendered does not accurately explain people like myself who have a different gender that they were born into but do not seek hormones nor surgery. We, bigendered people, struggle for equality because we do not exactly fit into the binary system of male or female. Recognizing in me that I am bigendered only creates understanding to others who might not like our presence in certain public and private spaces dedicated for a certain sex... For example, if my appearance is both female and male but I am a biologically female, does this mean that I cannot live or dwell in women’s’ places? If I say that I am bigendered and not transgendered that it is comfortable for me and others to use male or female pronouns. I have a female voice and I have noticeable breasts, how can I expect someone to call me a he? If someone calls me a he, this does not upset me nor do I ask individuals to apologize. I am often called he by people who did not know me. . . .

Transgender performance now at Rouge Bar

Katie Nelson and Peter Corbett
The Arizona Republic
Aug. 27, 2007 07:31 PM

A show Monday, Aug. 27 featuring the band Psychic TV and its transgender lead singer Genesis P-Orridge has been moved twice thanks to controversy over transgender people.

Psychic TV, whose seven members are mostly from New York, will now play at The Rouge Bar in Tempe, 423 N. Scottsdale Road.

"It's so frustrating," said P-Orridge, en route to The Rouge. "It has already cost us thousands of dollars. We had to stay here any extra day and we're loosing people who don't know where the hell we are now. I'm really sad for all my sisters in the transgender community. We've never ever encountered anything like this anywhere. We've played in over 30 countries and never been told we have to change venues because of what gender I am." . . .

Video: FTM Transsexual Interview

. . .on YouTube.

Monkey misery for Kenyan women villagers

By Juliet Njeri
BBC News, Nachu, central Kenya

A troop of vervet monkeys is giving Kenyan villagers long days and sleepless nights, destroying crops and causing a food crisis.

Earlier this month, local MP Paul Muite urged the Kenyan Wildlife Service to help contain their aggressive behaviour.

But Mr Muite caused laughter when he told parliament that the monkeys had taken to harassing and mocking women in a village.

But this is exactly what the women in the village of Nachu, just south-west of Kikuyu, are complaining about, sexual harassment.

They estimate there are close to 300 monkeys invading the farms at dawn. They eat the village's maize, potatoes, beans and other crops.

And because women are primarily responsible for the farms, they have borne the brunt of the problem, as they try to guard their crops.

The monkeys grab their breasts, and gesture at us while pointing at their private parts.

They say the monkeys are more afraid of young men than women and children, and the bolder ones throw stones and chase the women from their farms.

Nachu's women have tried wearing their husbands' clothes in an attempt to trick the monkeys into thinking they are men - but this has failed, they say.

"When we come to chase the monkeys away, we are dressed in trousers and hats, so that we look like men," resident Lucy Njeri told the BBC News website

"But the monkeys can tell the difference and they don't run away from us and point at our breasts. They just ignore us and continue to steal the crops."

In addition to stealing their crops, the monkeys also make sexually explicit gestures at the women, they claim.

"The monkeys grab their breasts, and gesture at us while pointing at their private parts. We are afraid that they will sexually harass us," said Mrs Njeri.

The Kenyan Wildlife Service told the BBC that it was not unusual for monkeys to harass women and be less afraid of them than men, but they had not heard of monkeys in Kenya making sexually explicit gestures as a form of communication to humans.

But whatever the truth of the villagers claims, the predominantly farming community is now having to receive famine relief food.

The residents say the monkeys have killed livestock and guard dogs, which has also left the villagers living in fear, especially for the safety of their babies and children.

All the villagers' attempts to control the monkeys have failed - the monkeys evade traps, have lookouts to warn the others of impending attacks and snub poisoned food put out by the residents.

"The troop has scouts which keep a lookout from a vantage point, and when they see us coming, they give warning signals to the ones in the farms to get away," said another area resident, Jacinta Wandaga.

The town has been warned by the Kenya Wildlife Service not to harm or kill any of the monkeys, as it is a criminal offence.

Running out of options, residents are harvesting their crops early in an attempt to salvage what they can of this year's crop.

Unfortunately, this only invites the monkeys to break into their homes and steal the harvested crops out of their granaries.

Even the formation of a "monkey squad" to keep track of the monkeys' movements and keep them out has failed.

The area is simply too large for the few volunteers to cover, they say.

Some residents have lost hope and abandoned their homes and farms, but those who have stayed behind, like 80-year-old James Ndungu, are making a desperate plea for assistance.

"For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away because we do not want to abandon our farms," he said.

"I beg you, please come and take these animals away from here so that we can farm in peace."

Disclosure thwarted adoption, trans man says

By Timothy Cwiek
PGN Writer-at-Large
© 2007 Philadelphia Gay News

A local transgender man says privacy invasions related to his sexual status prevented him from adopting in the tri-state area.

The trans man, who asked to remain unidentified, said he and his wife worked with a local adoption agency, Methodist Family Services of Philadelphia, for about four years, hoping to adopt a child in Pennsylvania, New Jersey or Delaware.

He said Methodist insisted on including a paragraph about his transgender status in the home study of the couple. State law requires that home studies be conducted before an individual or couple can become adoptive or foster parents.

The home study could be sent to all 67 counties in Pennsylvania, along with counties in New Jersey and Delaware, he said.

After more than 30 rejections, the trans man and his wife have decided to end their relationship with Methodist.

“We argued with them about including the [trans] information, because it’s not relevant and could hurt our chances of a match,” the man said. “But Methodist insisted and we finally relented. They said they needed to include it to cover their asses in the event the information came out at a later date.”

State and local laws governing home studies in the region are silent on the issue of transgender information, leaving decisions about including the material up to the discretion of the agency conducting the study.

Only one state — Florida — specifically forbids the adoption of children by lesbians and gays. Mississippi prohibits adoption by same-sex couples and second-parent adoption. Utah forbids adoption by any unmarried cohabitating couple.

Anne Rice Burgess, chief program officer for Methodist, said Methodist’s policy is to include the transgender status of a prospective parent in the home study, even if it might get into the hands of a biased county worker.

“We view this as an identity issue,” Burgess explained.

But she noted that future discussions with Methodist’s legal counsel might prompt the agency to amend its policy and not include the information in home studies.

Burgess also said Methodist would respect the wishes of lesbian, gay or bisexual clients who didn’t want their sexual orientation disclosed and that the organization strongly advocates for all of its prospective adoptive parents, including those who are GLBT.

The trans man expressed hope that every adoption agency, not only Methodist, would respect the privacy wishes of transgender clients.

“We weren’t trying to do anything misleading,” he said. “We just wanted to get our foot in the door. When you see other families getting kids after a few months, you realize that prejudice is taking place.” . . .

Finding the Real Me

Sing Tao Daily, News Feature, Xiaoqing Rong, translated by Eugenia Chien, Posted: Aug 27, 2007

Editor’s Note: Advocate Pauline Park, an Asian transgender woman who was adopted by a Caucasian couple, says she has finally found a sense of belonging.

The famous Chinese movie star Chen Xiao Ching once said, “It’s hard being a person, harder being a woman, and even harder being a famous woman.” What about being a transgender woman? Pauline Park, the chair of the New York Association for Gender Rights Advocacy, understands best the weight of this question.

Whenever someone asks Park where she is from, Park never knows how to answer. Park and her brother were adopted by a Caucasian couple from a Korean orphanage when Park was only eight months old. Growing up in a small town in Wisconsin, Park and his brother were the only non-white residents. When he was in elementary school, teachers and parents looked at Park and his brother curiously and asked, “Whose children are these?”

“Ever since I was a kid, I never knew where I belonged. I was born in Korea but I have never been there. I grew up in America but people call me Chinese or Japanese,” Park says.

Even more confusing for her was her sexuality. “When I was little, I felt that I was a girl. I was just a girl’s soul in a boy’s body,” she says. In 1978, Park and her brother left home to attend college in Madison, Wis. Madison had a more active gay and lesbian community, and the university had a center for gay and lesbian students. This was where Park and her brother came out as openly gay.

Park’s adoptive father passed away when she was 12. Not wanting to upset her adoptive mother, a devout Christian, Park hid her sexuality from her even after she came out of the closet. Even when a male admirer came to her house and roused suspicion from her mother, she still did not admit to being gay.

In 1981, Park left for the London School of Economics and fell madly in love with the first man she has ever lived with. She began dressing and living as a woman. Three years later, when Park graduated and returned to America to work in Chicago, her boyfriend traveled from London to see her. After her boyfriend left, Park’s adoptive mother finally openly talked about her son’s sexuality.

“She said to me, she knows that this man was my boyfriend. She didn’t use the term ‘gay,’ but she was subtly expressing to me that she can accept this,” Park says. . . .

CNN's Larry King. . .Transgender is the topic. . .FTM and MTF

Confusing Dildo and Penis Incredible

By: ARTHUR S. LEONARD

08/23/2007

A California appeals court has ruled that a woman married for 14 years to a person she mistakenly thought was a man, at least for some portion of that time, can have her marriage annulled, but cannot at the same time make a state community property marriage law claim to a portion of the value of the family home purchased in her "husband"'s name.

The August 15 ruling upheld San Bernardino County Superior Court Judge John M. Pacheco's original ruling in the case.

According to the court's opinion by Presiding Justice Manuel Ramirez, Joy H. claimed to believe that Tammy C., who presented as a man but never had a sex change, was in fact John R. Based on her stated belief that she had entered into a legally valid marriage, Joy H. made the community property claim.

The couple met at their workplace, and Tammy identified herself as John, having an ID obtained in Arizona. They married in 1988, and after the wedding John informed Joy that he was sterile so that artificial insemination would be required to have a child. A co-worker provided the sperm that enabled the couple to give birth to a girl in 1989.

According to Ramirez's opinion, "Although the parties had a sexually active relationship, Joy H. maintained that she did not know that Tammy C. was a biological female." Joy claimed that John said he was self-conscious about his obesity and asked her not to look at him or touch his genitalia during sex. That cover allowed John to use a silicone dildo for intercourse. . . .

"Pholomolo-No-Man-Woman" by Veronique Renard

What can we expect from early transitioning MTF TSs?

A range of outcomes. . .here is information from one person in autobiography.

And, see her web site and a photo history available here.

"Transgender Theories," KQED program transcript

See complete transcript . . .from tsroadmap.com

"Transgender Theories"

	Listen (RealMedia stream)
	Download (MP3) (Windows: right-click and choose "Save Target As." Mac: hold Ctrl, click link, and choose "Save As.")

The show examines the ongoing debate over research into transgender identity.

Host: Michael Krasny

Guests:

Dr. Alice Dreger, associate professor of Clinical Medical Humanities and BioEthics at Northwestern University

Dr. J. Michael Bailey, professor of Psychology at Northwestern University

Joan Roughgarden, professor of Biological Science at Stanford University and author of “Evolution's Rainbow"

Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality

---

"Lady" Korea's first female transgender band! Song: Attention

Add to My Profile | More Videos

That's Lady Bunny, Honey

by Bryan James Whitley



DJ Lady Bunny


Legendary drag queen, film star and DJ Lady Bunny returns to Buffalo this weekend for Summer in the City 2007: A Benefit for Pride Center of WNY. From her early days in Atlanta performing with RuPaul, Mr. Charlie Brown, and a host of others, to her meteoric rise to fame in the “Big Apple,” Lady Bunny has kept audiences entertained for more than 20 years.

I recently caught up with Lady Bunny to chat about her life, career, and her upcoming trip back to Buffalo…

Artvoice: First things first, where did you get the name “Lady Bunny”?

Lady Bunny: It was a bad joke that stuck! Southern drag queens often called themselves “Lady”—like the Lady Chablis. And “Bunny,” well, that’s anybody’s guess. I do remember that Sergeant Carter’s girlfriend on the TV show Gomer Pyle was named Bunny, but I also loved a rare late ’60s comic book called Bunny: Queen of the In Crowd that featured a blonde model in psychedelic outfits, which I’ve borrowed from heavily.

AV: I see. So, tell me about your first drag show?

LB: Well, I’m dating myself…but hell, why not? No one else wants to date me! I lip-synched to “Young Hearts Run Free” by Candi Staton at a party in the dump that RuPaul and I lived in in Atlanta. It was a fairly pitiful and drunken affair.

AV: How did you end up becoming a DJ too?

LB: Well, as dance music became more and more techno in the late ’80s—you know, pots and pans music with no vocals—I would often get hired to spin lighter music in a lounge off of the main dance floor to provide variety. Actually, Michael Alig (the axe-murdering “Party Monster”) gave me my first paying gig at a party called “Panty Girdles.” I’ve never really promoted myself as a DJ but there seems to be a demand. I think half of my appeal as a DJ is that I dance around and carry on, so they get a DJ and a clown both for the price of one!

But the other half is that I’m not afraid to play songs that people know and love…I’m not necessarily trying to be cutting edge. I don’t know a crowd who doesn’t love Whitney’s [Houston] “I’m Every Woman” and that song is over 10 years old! Especially at a gay event, who wouldn’t want to twirl to that? Ultimately, I play a little bit of everything based on the feeling I get from the crowd. I say, “Give ’em what they want. I can play what I like at home for free!” Making people dance is a celebratory sensation so it’s a job that makes you feel good. Or is it just the liquor? Whatever.

AV: So, what do you think is the most interesting thing about you?

LB: Since I’m so incredibly fascinating, I don’t think this interview is going to be long enough to list all of them. Ha, just kidding!

Seriously, I guess that a lot of people don’t realize that in addition to comedy, I actually have a very serious politically and socially conscious side. Gay people are under attack and it’s time to start fighting back. I’ve been writing a lot on my blog about current issues and have received good feedback from it. My blog even won a “Cybersocket Award for Best Personal Home Page” last year. So, I’m not just a potty-mouthed tramp. Although if a tramp is what your looking for…

AV: What’s your favorite thing to do when visiting Buffalo?

LB: Eating chicken wings! I actually had come directly from Wigstock [an annual outdoor drag-a-palooza organized by Bunny] the night before my last visit and since it was a daytime gig, I didn’t get to go sightseeing and had to leave the next day. So, perhaps some stud would like to show me around this time? Call me.

AV: Lastly, where can readers get more info on all things Lady Bunny?

LB: You can visit my Web site, Ladybunny.net, and check out my DVD trailer or press kit information with details on many of exploits, from Pamela Anderson’s Roast to Wigstock and more. I’m also thrilled to say that I was recently cast in the sequel to Another Gay Movie. So, keep your eye out for “Lady Bunion” on the big screen. I wouldn’t fit on a small one!. . .

I *AM* ARUNE

The title above is not really egotistical. As Lynn Conway now has a page on her web site titled “Who is Arune??” I thought to answer her in this essay.

There really is no need to discuss the basic question at any length. I am Willow Arune, a transsexual woman, retired lawyer and post-op, 57, happy as a clam and content with my life which I share with Sonia, our six cats and two dogs. Last November, we relocated to the wilderness of Prince George, in northern British Columbia, from Vancouver. How far north? Well, last night we watched the northern lights instead of television…

But that is not the story, really. The story is about Blanchard, Bailey, and the concerted efforts by some transsexual women to attack them and anyone who dares support them in any manner, fair or foul (and mostly foul). The real war started with the publication of a small book - “The Man Who Would Be Queen”, written by Michael Bailey. It contains three parts, the last of which deals in a popular science manner with the concepts of Ray Blanchard, of the Clarke Institute in Toronto, regarding transsexuality. Those leading the battle against the book, Blanchard, and anyone who crosses their sights, are Lynn Conway and Andrea James, both of whom have large web sites setting out their position and “investigations”.

Firstly, from the start of this mess, I have asked for calm - without much success. That first request can be found on the Web. As I found myself changing my initial opinion and seeking further clarification at certain points, I contacted Bailey, then Blanchard, Lawrence and Petersen, the major proponents of the autogynephilic concept. They have been most kind at sharing views and comments, including their participation in an AG support list of over 150 members.

In so doing, I became a target for James and Conway. Not that I wished to get fully engaged, but it seems that any supporter of Blanchard must perforce endure attacks by the two of them and their vehement allies. That has proven to be very nasty and at times, I must confess, I tend to lose my cool. At other times, I assume that the world must know of this situation and write accordingly, leaving some confused and lost.

Firstly, Bailey did very little "research" for the book, in the classical sense. It is an anecdotal explanation of Blanchard's concept applied to real situations of six women, and that only in Part 3. Bailey's own work is more truly reflected in Parts 1 and 2 - and Part 1 is what gives the book its title and cover. That was the publisher's decision, not Bailey's. I dislike both, but in the context of Part 1, it makes sense.

Blanchard did the research which Bailey reports on in his book, admittedly in a popular science manner. Blanchard started off in 1985, with 21 papers following, up to the mid 90s. His research is hard to find - and that is due in the main to the copyright rules of scientific publishers. At the time these papers were done, Blanchard was a psychologist at the Gender Identity Clinic of the Clarke (he joined in 1980); he is now the Head of Clinical Sexology Services at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, commonly referred to by transsexual women in Canada still as “the Clarke’. The availability of his research might soon change for the better. So my first comment is that most are dealing (sorry, Mike) with the monkey instead of the organ grinder. To understand Bailey in full, one must read the original material. Blanchard had a large number of subjects to participate in all of his studies. Other TS studies have had small numbers - the oft-cited Dutch brain study had but seven brains; Bolin had a sampling of 16 core transsexuals for “In Search of Eve”.

Secondly, Blanchard, Bailey and Petersen have been restricted in replying to their critics. They are bound by confidentiality - especially in respect of those that have been patients and who are now loudly critics. The temptation to reply in kind and with the true story must be overpowering - but they have not done so as they are professionals. Mike is facing one remaining (the others having been dropped) accusation at his university, where he is the head of his department. The merits of those accusations, or the remaining one, are suspect (reading about “Cher” - the major complainant - and "Robot Man" tends to dispel any aura of credibility that she may have, in my opinion). Any lawyer for the university would jump down hard if Mike were to respond to the vocal critics in any meaningful way. One recent article has dealt with the concerns, and the issues in a real sense, without the emotional rants. It is not a simple issue and as one sided as the critics seem to often suggest. I stress that such is an accusation, not proven, not yet determined.

That leaves Anne Lawrence, for long an icon in the TS groups. That she has done much to help is obvious; that she has been vilified - and no doubt deeply hurt - from attacks from the very ones she has helped must be mortifying. Most, I find, have rushed to judgement. . . .

The explosive rethinking of sex reassignment

MARGARET WENTE

From Saturday's Globe and Mail

August 24, 2007 at 9:19 PM EDT

At 50, Roy Berkowitz-Shelton was a caring, well-respected family doctor with a flourishing practice in Massachusetts. He was bald and had a beard. He and his wife, Allison, had a long and loving marriage and two nearly grown kids.

There was just one problem with his life. Ever since he could remember, Roy had been attracted to women's makeup and clothes. One day, on a trip to the grocery store, he blurted out: “Allison, I feel I'm a woman.”

Today, 21/2 years later, he has fulfilled his dream. He is now Dr. Deborah Bershel. Deborah dresses in dark skirts and teal tops and owns a dozen pairs of high heels. She loves to shop. Thanks to female hormones and facial surgery, which smoothed her forehead, reshaped her nose, softened her jaw line and shaved her Adam's apple, she resembles someone's kindly aunt. Now, she wants to take the final step: surgery that would amputate her penis and create a vagina.

“I feel like a whole person now,” she says.

Deborah's journey was sympathetically recounted this month by the Boston Globe magazine. It is not so unusual any more. Transgendered people now share equal billing with gays, lesbians and bisexuals in the ever-expanding panoply of sexual minorities. The standard explanation is that they are the victims of a biological mistake, born into a body of the wrong sex. The vast majority of transgendered people are biological men who wish to become women.

In liberal Massachusetts, Deborah encountered very little social disapproval of her sex change. On the contrary. Her patients and co-workers have been immensely supportive. Her Conservative Jewish synagogue never wavered. Most people in our tolerant, open society believe people should be able to follow their own path to happiness and self-fulfilment. If anything, they think Deborah is courageous. “It takes a lot of soul-searching to sacrifice the things you have to be true to yourself,” said Denise Leclair, executive director of the International Foundation for Gender Education.

But not everything has been smooth. Deborah was certain she would be able to maintain her marriage. She believed that after her transition, she and her family would begin a deeper and more honest life together. And indeed, her wife, Allison, tried to keep an open mind. She went with Roy to a cross-dressing convention. She took care of Deborah after her facial surgery. They went to marriage counselling together. In the end, it didn't work. Allison told Deborah there was a reason she had married a man, and asked her to move out.

Deborah's teenaged son is handling the adjustment well. But her 20 year-old daughter has become estranged and refuses to speak to her. Deborah's father seems resigned. “I'm heartbroken,” he says, “but he's my son.”

Deborah says she wasn't suicidal as a man – just restless and unfulfilled. She doesn't seem to have much remorse or guilt for the destruction of her family or the pain she's caused. She's exploring the singles scene and has posted her profile on a women-to-women dating site.

In the gay-rights movement and the academic world, nothing – but nothing – is more explosive than the science and politics of gender. And that includes the subject of transgendered women.

In the prevailing narrative, people like Roy are essentially women trapped in the bodies of men. But there is another theory, one that's deeply unpopular, to say the least. It holds that they are really men with an unusual psychological quirk: a male deviation called autogynephilia.

This theory is largely based on research studies conducted at Toronto's Clarke Institute during the 1980s and 90s. It found that some men who seek sex changes are driven mainly by an intense erotic fascination with dressing up as women. The researchers found that as they get older, these men (predominantly heterosexual) become increasingly eager to add more realism to their presentations through surgery. As women, they rhapsodize about being able to express their natural inclinations for shopping, makeup, domesticity and gentleness. But in other ways, they aren't womanly at all. They aren't interested in babies and children. And, like Deborah, they still find women sexually attractive. After their transition, they see themselves as lesbians.

One expert who supports this theory is psychologist J. Michael Bailey of Northwestern University. His 2003 book, The Man Who Would Be Queen, explains the biology of sexual orientation and gender. It has been called a compelling explanation of the science. But he has been bitterly denounced for his treatment of transgender issues. One prominent academic, a transgendered woman, compared his views to Nazi propaganda. Another well-known transgendered academic, Deirdre McCloskey, called his work “false, unscientific and politically damaging.” He has been accused of gross violations of scientific standards, and his research associates were warned by others in the field to keep their distance. He told The New York Times that the two years after he published his book were the hardest of his life.

Some people believe the crusade against Dr. Bailey is political correctness run amok. Alice Dreger, an ethics scholar brought in to conduct a lengthy investigation, exonerated him of wrongdoing and said, “What happened to Bailey is important, because the harassment was so extraordinarily bad and because it could happen to any researcher in the field.” . . .