posted by Carrie Wooten at 7:37 AM on Jul 6, 2007Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: Transmen in Women-Only SpacesThe first transgender support group meeting that I've ever attended was about two months ago. It was after a board meeting I had been a part of, and so I decided to stick around for a bit and see how it operated. The support group is IndyBoyz, (for any transmen, transwomen or SOFFAS who are in the greater Indianapolis area and would like to know more). A conversation that began in that setting was from young college males talking about the issue of transitioning in a historically women only space, and what that means. The consensus seemed to lean towards it being a cop-out for someone to enter a women-only space as a transman because they knew that it would be a safe space for them to transition.
This reminded me of a series that I had watched several months earlier called TransGeneration, which followed four transgender college students in their daily lives to show the various struggles and dangers that come with realizing and actualizing who you really are in, at times, non-supportive spaces. One of the college students, Lucas, attended Smith College and during his senior year, decided to start testosterone therapy because he was becoming increasingly distressed that his body did not reflect who he knew himself to be. Lucas had entered Smith as Leah (the name given to him by his parents), but had presented as male, and started a transgender support group on campus during his time there.
There are lots of nuances with this situation - questions of motive, questions of understanding oneself to a certain degree, questions of policing borders and identity politics, questions of who can participate in feminism and who cannot. Women-only spaces have often been sites of freedom for those who feel traumatized by male-centric cultures. However, I think there is a certain amount of "wolves in sheep's clothing" dogma going on that mirrors the conversations at the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival, whose entrance policy is that of "womyn-born womyn only," which seeks to pointedly deny entrance to transwomen. I think sometimes we get so caught up in what people look like that we forget to consider what they want to do and how they might help. If we are to believe Simone de Beauvoir who said, "One is not born, but rather, becomes a woman," then isn't male identity just as fluid and contextual, and shouldn't that be considered just as valid to the movement? Because when we start basing borders and spaces on who is concretely and absolutely excluded, we are only re-inscribing hierarchies that ultimately lead us down a path we do not want to tread.